The Battle Over Your TV

If you were thinking of starting a set-top box company that delivers video content to the TV, let me stop you right there. There are already numerous players vying to dominate your digital entertainment future, and three of them are big names that you already know. Those three are also well-funded, well-equipped, and well on their way to becoming the center of your home video universe.

Amazon: The e-tailing giant just announced its new Video on Demand service, which will stream 40,000 movie and TV titles directly to Internet-connected Sony Bravia TVs and other devices. In addition to already having a huge user base to which it can market the service, Amazon will store all purchased movies on its end rather than with the end user, an approach that is likely to endear it to piracy-hating studios.

Currently the big sticking point with Amazon’s VOD service is that it doesn’t offer movies in HD — a must for this day and age. And hopefully the company will learn from Unbox, its earlier download video service that only worked on PCs and TiVos and didn’t exactly set the world on fire.

Netflix: The DVD-by-mail rental company is prepping for a disc-free future by streaming 10,000 of its titles to the Roku and the Xbox 360. Both offer an all-you-can-watch video buffet baked right into your existing subscription, which makes using the streaming service a snap.

But if Netflix is going to beat out the competition, it needs to build that catalog far beyond just 10,000 titles (most of which are pretty lame). It also needs to offer HD video. The Roku and Xbox 360 are HD-capable, but no word yet as to when HD titles will be available.

Apple: Steve Jobs & Co. helped spark the latest digital video revolution through iTunes and Apple TV, the set-top box that pipes iTunes content directly to your TV. Titles from all the major studios are available on the same day they’re released on DVD, plus the signature Apple simplicity and style makes it hard to beat.

Apple has said it’s renting or selling 50,000 movies a day through iTunes and the service is projected to pump out 18.25 million movies this year. But what we don’t know is how many actual Apple TV boxes the company has sold. The device was projected to sell 1 million units in 2007, but barely sold 400,000. It was then relaunched in January of this year with a renewed effort behind it; popular shows like “The Office” and “30 Rock,” however, still aren’t available.

And while these three have the best shot of succeeding in the digital video download space, they are by no means the only ones trying.

Game consoles, long considered a way for companies like Microsoft and Sony to establish a beachhead through which they could offer more services, are now boasting video capabilities as well. In addition to the Netflix streaming capabilities of the Xbox 360, there is also the Xbox Live Marketplace, from which you can purchase downloadable movies and TV shows. Meanwhile, Sony just launched its video service for the PS3. But the appeal of these devices will always be largely limited to gamers.

Televisions with Internet functionality built in could eliminate the set-top box altogether by offering access to web video directly or using the new tru2way technology to deliver interactive TV functionality. A shift from set-top boxes to the TV would benefit Amazon and Netflix most, as Apple would likely be loathe to give up that much control.

The real wild card in this battle will be the efforts of the cable and telecom companies. Their set-top boxes have a huge footprint in the market (Comcast alone has 24.7 million cable customers), and they have proven, by throttling certain kinds of traffic, that they can play dirty. Now they’re even considering usage-based pricing, which would mean that the more video you download or stream through the Internet, the more you pay.

There are other participants, some that are well known, like HP with its HP MediaSmart Connect, or TiVo. And some are upstarts, like Vudu, Zv, Verismo and Sezmi. But the future belongs to Amazon, Netflix or Apple. It’s still too early to tell which one will win the race to your big-screen TV, but they all have the right combination of size, recognition and content to get there.

This was originally published in