Why Apple Could — and Should — Bring Voice Recognition Technology to our Phones

Perhaps no other technology in mobile has been as overhyped yet underwhelming as voice recognition. Long billed as a kind of holy grail of mobile computing, the actual reality is that voice recognition has been awkward, inaccurate and often unusable, resulting in misdialed phone calls and incomprehensible messages. Naturally, consumers have failed to embrace the stuff, but Apple may be about to change that.
How? Apple has reportedly been in discussions to license voice recognition technology, dubbed Dragon, from Nuance, a longtime player in the space. The iPhone maker may integrate Dragon with iOS 5, which will be discussed by Apple execs next week at WWDC in San Francisco. Dragon has drawn acclaim for its performance in a variety of Nuance’s PC apps and is the muscle behind Siri, a highly touted iPhone app and the flagship product behind the startup of the same name that Apple  acquired last year. Apple could make the technology available to developers as a built-in API in iOS 5, handing app creators a valuable new tool. Such a move would not only give voice recognition a much-needed push into the mobile mainstream, it would give Apple the chance to once again transform the way we interact with our phones. Here’s why:
1) Voice recognition technology is finally ready for prime time. Dragon has received rave reviews from mobile users, and Nuance’s FlexT9 dictation app for Android, powered by Dragon, sells for a mere $5 and enjoys a four-star user rating after more than 1,100 reviews. Nuance isn’t the only player drawing attention: Slate’s Farhad Manjoo recently praised Google’s voice recognition technology for Android, saying that it “actually works,” even when you throw a curveball like asking how many angstroms are in a mile. And there is no shortage of compelling use cases, from having a navigation app while driving (when your hands should be on the wheel) to dictating lengthy messages rather than typing them on the shrunken keyboard.
2) Apple knows how to educate the consumer. Voice recognition has come a long way, but it still isn’t all that simple to use. Nuance directs FlexT9 users to a series of online videos to demonstrate how to use the app, for instance, and Manjoo points out that Google’s technology requires users to say the words “period” or “comma” if they want to add punctuation to their messages, which isn’t exactly intuitive. But Apple’s marketing genius lies in showing consumers how to use technology: The first iPhone commercials were a tutorial in how to surf the Web, access email and find nearby businesses on the phone. A similar marketing campaign could illustrate how to do all those things and more by talking, not typing. And that could eliminate the need for users to hunt down online how-to videos just to use the technology.
3) Apple is a master of the user interface. There were plenty of devices with touchscreens before the iPhone came along; Apple’s true innovation was in simplifying the technology with an intuitive user interface to make it easy for users to navigate their phones. The move was so effective that it changed the way many of us interact with our handsets, and we eschewed physical keyboards and trackballs in favor of one-touch navigation and virtual keyboards. Apple could do the same with voice by integrating Dragon closely with iOS, making it easy to send text messages or navigate the Safari browser by speaking. And the legions of iOS developers will surely find innovative new ways to leverage voice in use cases like messaging, gaming, navigation and social networking.
It’s still not clear that Apple will come to terms with Nuance, but a licensing deal would throw the door open for voice recognition technology in mobile. A few years ago, Apple changed the way we use our phones. Now the company might just do it again.

Question of the week

Can Apple and Nuance change the way we interact with our phones?