Over the last few years Mobile World Congress, the mobile phone industry trade show, has experienced a shift from being about mobile phones to being about always-on connectivity. Mobile broadband has changed the value of the mobile ecosystem and thus the players who care about it.
Things are looking dire for dead tree media of all sorts as the consumer electronics industry takes aim at newspapers, magazines, and the humble mass of paper known as a book. But between iPhones (s aapl), dedicated e-readers and the much anticipated tablet, what does the consumer electronics industry’s infatuation with reading mean for those providing the components that make such devices work?
The answer could be big for the chip industry, as In-Stat estimates that up to 28.6 million dedicated e-readers could be sold in 2013. However, such a prediction don’t take into account the launch of Apple’s tablet and may not accurately factor in the habits of those who read on their smartphones. Mobile application analytics provider Flurry, as Om noted back in November, sees books becoming the leading category of apps downloaded on the iPhone.
David Carey, a teardown expert at Portelligent, says it’s not clear if dedicated e-readers or tablets designed to consume media will displace existing netbooks, notebooks or smartphones. If they add to our overall gadgets then yes, they will expand the market opportunity for chip vendors. If they don’t, they’ll just help to redistribute consumer device spending.
It’s an obvious point, for sure, but less obvious is how the success of a particular type of device may affect industry players. Currently Freescale Semiconductor is the market leader in the dedicated e-reader space with chips in the Kindle (s amzn) and the Sony (s sne) Reader. When it comes to smartphones, companies like Qualcomm (s qcom), Samsung (its applications processor powers the iPhone) and Texas Instruments (s txn) are vying for domination. Those same companies, along with Marvell (s mrvl) and its Armada line of chips, will also attempt to power a tablet with Samsung said to be providing the silicon inside the new Apple device.
That covers the brains of the reading devices, but what about their displays? When evaluating the total cost of a reading device certain form factors will imply more spending on the brains than the display — the component that I think of as beautiful. Dedicated e-readers have overall higher costs thanks to the proprietary nature of e-ink displays, and those costs are unlikely to come down as fast as the price for LCD screens. Using the brains vs. beauty ratio (application processor vs. display), Carey said dedicated e-readers have a 1:2 ratio with manufacturers spending $2 on beauty for every dollar spent on applications processors.
With smartphones or superphones, for every dollar a manufacturer spends on beauty, they spend 75 cents on brains. For example, in Google’s Nexus One the Snapdragon processor with integrated cellular radio costs $30.50 and the screen plus the capacitive touch components costs $41. In the iPhone 3G S, the applications processor plus the cellular radio (it’s not integrated in the iPhone) costs $27.46 while the screen and touch components cost $35.75.
It’s likely that the ratio of brains to beauty will start out closer to the 1:2 ratio for dedicated e-readers, but that the prices will drop as the cost of LCD screens drops, estimates Carey. Of course, as consumers decide they want their tablet to do more, the demand for smarter slates could force the application processor innovation (and costs) up.
So for the chip firms hoping that e-readers will provide a steady market for their wares, the future is still cloudy. The end products are so different they can’t possibly meet the needs of every consumer. Dedicated e-readers last longer on a single charge, but likely won’t ever deliver as rich media a experience that a tablet or smartphone could (plus young people aren’t that into them), while words on LCD screens used by smartphones and potentially on a tablet can be hard to read over a long period of time. Some folks may use a smartphone, since they don’t read that much anyhow, while others will go to their graves clutching their ripped, dog-eared novels proud to have only owned printed versions of the printed word.
Related GigaOM Pro Research:
Image courtesy of Flickr user timetrax23
This article also appeared in BusinessWeek.com.
While much has been made of Google’s Chrome OS and its potential, the adaptability of the Android OS is what makes it more disruptive than its shinier smartbook-oriented cousin Chrome. Its appeal to everyone from chipmakers to serial entreprenuers will be seen at CES.
The 2010 Consumer Electronics Show, which takes place Jan. 7-10 in Las Vegas, is rapidly approaching. Numerous important technologies — such as 802.11b, the first really widely adopted Wi-Fi standard — got their early boosts at the show. Here’s what to expect this time.
The phone of the the not-so-distant future will be better — but not much bigger — than today’s devices. Unlike many of today’s phones, it won’t sport a keyboard, will have more radios, and will be even better able to function as a portable computer.
[qi:gigaom_icon_chip] Microsoft (s msft) and Intel (s intc) this summer both snapped up companies with technology that helps software developers build programs that take advantage of multicore chips. Last July I pulled together a list of five startups to watch in the multicore programming space, and prompted by Microsoft announcing on Monday (technically the first day of autumn) that it had bought one of them, I decided to take a look at where those five startup are now. Read More about Intel, Microsoft Gorging on Multicore Programming Startups
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., like many semiconductor companies, is on the lookout for new markets, and according to some reports, the company thinks it could generate more than $2 billion in revenue from opportunities that include solar and LEDs. The company’s not alone. The semiconductor business is struggling in the face of a long recession and the success of less powerful, smaller-margin chips like Intel’s Atom; but demand for green technologies is going strong, and innovative products in this area could help semiconductor companies bolster their margins.
A new GigaOM Pro report out today looks more closely at one green opportunity: LED solid-state lighting. It’s the first research note in a three-part series from the GigaOM Analyst Network’s Katherine Austin looking at how semiconductor companies can capitalize on opportunities in the green market. Among her findings, Austin says the market for LEDs in general lighting applications could reach $10 billion by 2012, up more than 40 percent from today’s total LED market (which also includes LEDs for cars, cell phones, etc.) Get the full analysis here (subscription required).
When it comes to all the gadget-y things that now fill up our world — from computers to mobile phones — we should thank Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce, the inventors of the integrated circuit. Fifty years ago today, while all of his colleagues were on vacation, Kilby wired a few transistors on a piece of silicon and created the first microchip.
That’s the story we hear in Texas, where Kilby spent his career at Texas Instruments, although Robert Noyce, the co-founder of Intel and Fairchild Semiconductor, shares credit for the invention as well. Today there are more chips than people, and the humble IC has grown into the engines that run our modern world. Read More about Happy 50th Birthday, Dear Microchip
Despite reporting a second-quarter loss last night, due in part to costs associated with the faulty packaging on some of its chips placed in thousands of laptops, Nvidia still has a plan for semiconductor domination through the GPU. But if it wants to execute, it needs to accept the realities that come with stepping into a competitive market. The earnings call shows Nvidia still has a lot to learn.
In yesterday evening’s call, CEO Jen-Hsun Huang admitted to a $196 million charge because of problems with its GPUs in some laptops. He also talked about some pricing mishaps that occurred as AMD pushed out a highly competitive product with a lower price. Nvidia is learning, but there are two bright spots in the call, related to its Tegra chipset for mobile Internet devices and smartphones and bringing high-level parallel processing to the consumer.
Huang said Tegra wouldn’t be shipping in products until next year (something he told us earlier this year in an interview), but growth from CUDA on laptops and desktops should have an impact over the second half of this year (which will be the second half of fiscal 2009 for the firm). CUDA is a programming tool that allows software coded in C languages to run on the multiple cores in a GPU. It helped the company make inroads in the scientific computing community, and thanks to software from startups such as Elemental Technologies, the goal is to bring that level of parallel processing to consumers. Read More about Can Nvidia Play with the Big Boys?
[qi:_newteevee] Elemental Technologies, a startup focused on faster transcoding, has raised $7.1 million from General Catalyst Partners and Voyager Capital. The company’s software uses the graphics processor rather than the CPU inside a computer to handle the work of ripping a DVD or video file to another format. It’s one of several startups using Nvidia’s GPUs for tasks once allocated to the CPU, and bolstering the idea that GPUs might be better suited than the CPU to some tasks, such as scientific computing or video transcoding. To read more check out our coverage on NewTeeVee.