Get Evernote, Pocket, LastPass & Wunderlist in one $60 bundle

This is a good deal: Evernote, password manager LastPass, to-do-list app Wunderlist and read-it-later service Pocket have bundled premium subscriptions to all four services in a single “Productivity Pack” for $59.99 (found via The Verge).

I already used all four services but was only paying for Evernote Premium, which is $45 per year; I’ve been using Pocket, Wunderlist and LastPass’s free versions. But for an additional $15 a year I’m excited to try the pro versions of those apps. Normally Pocket Premium is $44.99 a year, Wunderlist Pro is $49.99 a year and LastPass Premium is $12 a year. With the bundle you’re saving $125.

The deal started Tuesday and runs for “a limited time.” You must redeem your upgrade codes by March 13. You’re eligible to buy the bundle even if you already have premium subscriptions to the services; your additional year will just start once your current paid period ends. You also get a bonus eight-week digital subscription to the New York Times, but that’s only available if you didn’t subscribe to the NYT already.

The trend toward smaller outsourcing deals

The trend toward smaller outsourcing deals can easily be misinterpreted. It does not necessarily mean that the outsourcing market is declining, that enterprises will end up fragmenting their outsourcing relationships, or even that outsourcing margins will be squeezed with new cloud, mobile and analytics technology.
Declining numbers in the market
Some 2013 numbers declined from the previous year. There has been a double-digit drop in average contract value and some dips in total market revenue since 2012. Manufacturing and business process outsourcing (BPO) have been especially impacted. A trend toward smaller outsourcing deals was seen previously in 2011 the U.S. and more recently in Europe (after an initial large-deal surge in Europe with a new-found openness to offshore solutions sparked by economic uncertainty in the region).
A need to adapt
Coming into 2014, the trend reached a level at which both vendors and buyers must adapt. IT servicers with declining revenue or weak revenue growth are likely to quote the trend in part as an explanation of their revenue challenge (e.g., HP and Wipro). HP’s head of Enterprise Services, Mike Nefkens, reports that it now takes twice as many contracts as used to be required to generate the same level of revenue. In other words, their average contract size has dropped by 50%.
But not necessarily smaller outsourcing relationships
Other vendors, such as TCS, that have robust revenue growth also tend to have growth in the level of revenue that they are garnering from their largest clients. TCS CEO and Managing Director N. Chandrasekaran described his firm’s experience in its latest earnings call:
“I do not think that the size of the deal is anything to do with our sales or anything like that. On Digital, customers are learning. They may allocate a huge budget, but they cannot commit a huge budget because the whole transformation is not something that one can think through so easily. So, the whole journey of imagining the digital impact is something that the customers are going through.
They have a lot more clarity now than before, so the deal sizes have gone up from before. But please don’t expect customers to sign up half a billion dollars checks on Digital. That is not the way it is going to be done. But, they will spend half a billion dollars, but it will be in terms of a lot of projects of varying sizes; some could be a few million, some could be 10 million, that is something that will evolve.”
IT buyers gaining confidence in the new technologies
That is, the trend toward smaller deals does not necessarily mean smaller outsourcing relationships. In fact, it well could contribute to consolidation in the industry, as IT buyers can more easily gravitate to the current industry leaders. TCS has also noticed that very small, experimental deals for the likes of cloud, analytics and mobile have given way in recent months to deals in the millions of dollars range, as customers have become more certain of their commitment to new technologies.
A limited ‘best of breed’ purchasing trend
What is happening now is becoming known as a ‘best of breed’ purchasing trend, whereby IT buyers may select the best-suited provider for each small to medium-scale implementation. This trend has been noted for several years, and it has picked up steam in the sense that public cloud SaaS options are now chipping away at previously omnibus solutions. (E.g., the success of Salesforce and Workday in infiltrating the Global 1000.) But there is more to the dynamic than that.
IT buyers are moving one step at a time
In large part, this trend is driven by buyers only sorting out and committing to one step of an advanced IT investment in cloud, mobile and/or analytics at a time. It is in that sense endemic to transformational, ‘change the business’–as opposed to ‘run the business’–deals involving fast-evolving technologies. This makes sense at a time when technology investments and decisions have greater effects on the business and business executives are becoming more involved in technology decisions as well.
The benefits and limitations of smaller deals
Shorter-term and smaller-scale deals make it easier, on one hand, for buyers to maximize their leverage with providers and to rein in time and cost overruns. Such patchwork deals can cause problems, however, when too many vendors are involved. Issues of integration, continuity and ultimate responsibility inevitably come into play. Thus, the idea is not generally to pull in different IT services partners for each new project.
The enterprise buyer, as Nefkens has noted, has become more hands-on in IT implementation and management. And, one side benefit of hammering out smaller and shorter deals is that the process forces a more frequent meeting of minds between enterprise buyers and their service providers. That is a positive step for buyers.
Separating SaaS from system management, development and integration
It is easy to conflate the potential cost-extraction of SaaS and public cloud computing with declining margins for outsourcing. But the drive to outsource has long been based on a combination of both specialization and the lower labor cost of offshoring. Many SaaS services aren’t really counted among traditional outsourcing. But the complexity, importance, and rapid development requirements of cloud, mobile and analytics applications are ultimately pushing many enterprises to look for outside specialists—while also providing plenty of input and oversight. Meanwhile, for traditional offshorers, such as the major India-centric companies, it is only the move to this next generation of technology that is ultimately starting to free them from the tyranny of often-rising, offshore wages. Engagements based on these technologies are enabling higher, not lower, margins.
The net for IT buyers
The nature of outsourcing deals is changing. Outsourcers are providing more piecemeal, but transformative implementations of new technologies. Along the way, the relationship between enterprise and outsourcer is becoming higher-level and more consultative. In selected areas, it is also reaching further into the enterprise line of business. (Thus, the nature of BPO is also in flux.) The specialized skills of outsourcers are becoming more important for many companies facing daunting complexity in handling, for example, multicloud implementations. Lower offshore labor costs are still a factor, but the new technologies are enabling some providers to improve their margins. Those vendors who best manage the change will pull ahead. With smaller deals, IT buyers will find it easier to shift allegiance to the leaders in a new generation of more sophisticated and tighter outsourcing partnerships.

A TV Everywhere truce

To be sure, Time Warner Cable needed to avoid another CBS-like debacle. But Viacom, too, had incentive to avoid a protracted fight over carriage.

Disney’s first-mover advantage

Disney struck at the moment when landing a major studio deal in the pay-TV window probably has the greatest strategic value to Netflix. It’s unlikely Netflix will be willing or able to make many more such deals with other studios, however.

GroceryServer, ZipList put the web to work clipping coupons

GroceryServer and ZipList have bridged the gap between the store circular and the web. They’ve linked local and national grocery deals to the shopping list stored on your phone and created a hyperlocal marketing platform that benefits the farmers’ market as well as Whole Foods.

Red hot: Russian internet deals tripled in 2011

The Russian internet market has seen a lot of activity over the past year, but now there’s some data that proves exactly how much more is happening. And what do the stats say? That dealflow was up more than threefold between 2010 and 2011.

Mobile payments coming to a loyalty/deals app near you

Groupon is reportedly testing out its own Square-like mobile payment service. It’s a sign that local deals and loyalty providers are increasingly looking at adding mobile payments services to help build out their tool set for merchants and retailers.