Box can’t IPO, so now what?

Danny Crichton has opened a can of worms by pointing out that Box and Square are a/ highly valued companies that b/ are finding the spring of 2014 a very difficult time to move toward their planned IPOs, because c/ the market has soured on cloud computing companies that are burning through hundreds of millions.

Square has apparently lost more than $100 million in 2013, and Box — the real subject of this post — lost almost $160 million last year.

Fred Wilson dismisses Crichton’s argument that the two companies have ‘commodity’ products that have failed to capture the ‘last mover’ advantage (a term of Peter Thiel’s, meaning the competitor in a market that gains enough of an advantage so that others are squeezed out). But he does agree with Crighton’s observation that the two companies are caught in a valuation trap:

A second iron law of startups might be that the higher the valuation of a startup, the fewer options it has for financing and exits…… once a company has raised mezzanine capital and is valued in the billions, its options are essentially to go public or find a very interested buyer with deep pockets. There are few other options on this side of the startup pipeline.

As Wilson points out,

So the moral of this story is that you can push valuations when you have investors knocking down your door, but unless you are cash flow positive and expect to remain so for the foreseeable future, you do that at your own risk. You will need to find someone to top that price down the road and that person may not be there.

Backing up a few steps, my view is that this discussion is about the changing stock market, and less about what Box and Square were doing in 2013.

In particular, it seems that investors are looking at software-as-a-service solutions with jaundiced eyes, based on recent flare-ups about Twitter, Amazon and other companies already in the market.

And taking a hard look at the file sync-and-share space, it’s true that Box has a long list of competitors, some that are start-ups — like Dropbox, Hightail, and Egnyte — and many of which are part of very well capitalized giants, like Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Apple iCloud, Citrix FileShare, and EMC Syncplicity, as well as well-established enterprise secure file management companies — like Intralinks — who are rapidly building out functionality to compete head-to-head in this space. These are companies that have wagered on the central role of file sync-and-share in the new computing architecture emerging in today’s ‘mobile first, cloud first’ world.

But anyone who looks deeply in the market does not see commoditization, but competition. A great deal of competition.

And those of us in the business of reading the tea leaves would say this is a market ripe for consolidation. Hundreds of millions — and soon billions? — of users in the personal side of things, hundreds of millions on the enterprise side, and who is in the best position to dominate?

My belief is simple. File sync-and-share is a patch to a basic flaw in the operating systems that dominate the world: iOS, OS X, Windows, and Android. Those operating systems are stuck in the past, and lack the notion of a distributed virtual file system. However, those operating systems — the platforms on which so much of our world runs — can be updated to implement a more modern notion of file system. And once they do, Apple, Google, and Microsoft will suck 90% of the value out of this marketplace.

To take that step, those companies may decide to acquire start-ups like Box and Dropbox, or simply knock off what they have done. But once Apple, Microsoft, and Google implement file sync-and-share functionality for free, out of the box (pun intended), I bet that the ecosystem would rapidly shift to those solutions. Value-added players — with enterprise oriented security capabilities, for example — would still play a role in the enterprise side of things, but the majority of these players would be high and dry, unless acquired by one of the majors.

So, the big question isn’t the short term blockage to a Box IPO, but how long before Microsoft, Apple, and Google build file sync and share in the OS.

 

Box IPO on hold because of iffy markets

Box, the enterprise file sync-and-share company, is opting to delay its IPO until June or beyond, given the enormous downdraft in the markets for cloud computing offerings, according to the Wall Street Journal.

An index of 37 cloud computing companies calculated by Bessemer Venture Partners reached its lowest point this year on Monday, and the companies included have lost $58 billion in the past few months.

Screenshot 2014-05-01 09.31.30

Box doubled revenues from 2012 to $124.2 million in 2013. But losses grew to $170 million in 2013, 50% larger than the year prior. Investors may value Box less now that they seem to be punishing stocks with small or non-existent profits, like Twitter and Amazon. Enterprise software firms like Workday and Veeva have lost 25% of their market cap or more.

Rumors are swirling about a possible sale of Box to a large player, like Apple or Microsoft, but the company’s trajectory to date has been to pursue an independent future, although an exit by acquisition is always an option, and one that may become more attractive to Box’s board if the market remain discouraged about low/no profit cloud companies.

5 cleantech trends to watch in 2014

From continued growth for the internet of things to regulatory headaches for the share economy, there’s much to watch for in cleantech in the coming year.

Why big data will be even bigger in 2013

GigaOM Research analysts Jo Maitland and George Gilbert discuss the cloud in 2013: what to know, who to watch, and crazy predictions for the coming months.

Valuing Spotify

Where did Spotify’s extra $1 billion in projected valuation go? Whatever the exact cause, there is ample reason for investors to be cautious about any one company working the digital music space right now.

Silicon Valley tech boom is inflating rents… by a lot

San Francisco red-hot startup activity is not only inflating the commercial real estate market, but it is also having an impact on the residential rental market, data shows. Since January 2011 annual rents are up by $5000, but down in Peninsula, rents are up even higher.

Today in Connected Consumer

Mogulfest 2012, this year’s edtion of the annual gathering of media and technology chieftains organized by investment bank Allen & Co., opens on Tuesday in Sun Valley, Idaho,  Attendees are not given a formal schedule of the dinners, lunches and panel discussions until after they arrive, but we already know the menu will be heavy on Schadenfreude. Once upon a time, executives from old-line media companies bestrode Sun Valley like giants. But in recent years, upstart technology companies have been showing up and stealing some of the old guard’s deal-making and ego-messaging thunder. This year, however, with Wall Street humbling once high-flying tech companies like Facebook and Zynga, media companies say the natural order of things is returning. “Last year it was ‘holy s–t,’ these guys are geniuses,” one attendee told the New York Post. “This year we are feeling a little less wobbly. They have been humbled.” If I were Mark Zuckerberg I wouldn’t sit too close to Rupert Murdoch around the campfire.

Today in Connected Consumer

Just as Facebook’s shares seem to be recovering from their post-IPO plunge, the company has been forced to agree to significant changes in how it manages its Sponsored Stories, one of its most effective and lucrative advertising tools. To settle a lawsuit, Facebook has agreed to allow users to see how their activity on the social network is used to generate ads and to opt out of Sponsored Stories altogether if they want. The changes could have a significant impact on Facebook’s monetization prospects going forward.

Today in Connected Consumer

The New York Times ran a gloomy editorial this morning about investors’ loss of faith in equity markets and the huge outflow of capital from stock funds over the past three years. But don’t tell that to retail brokers, who are reporting 1999-like demand from individual investors for a piece of Facebook’s IPO. The Wall Street Journal even found an 11-year old who wants to bet her college fund on Facebook shares. The fact that Facebook’s bankers have raised the price range for the offering can only fuel the frenzy. Odd then that nearly half of Americans in a survey, including Facebook users, think the social network is a fad that will have a relatively short life cycle. Nearly 60 percent of Facebook users also express little faith that the company will keep the data it collects on them private, and more than half say they never click on the ads or sponsored content that are currently Facebook’s only source of revenue.