Vid-Biz: Yahoo, The Office, Bebo

Yahoo Series Makes Sweet Music; featuring big-name musicians, Nissan Live Sets generates roughly 4 million streams per month. (Variety)

Universal Using Mobile to Promote DVDs; studio providing clips from DVD bonus features of Heroes and The Office across Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T. (Video Business)

Bebo Appoints Head of Original Productions; Kelly Brett worked on KateModern for a year and had previously worked for the BBC, Sky and ITV. (release)

Next2Friends Live Now on Windows Devices; UK-based mobile video streaming service now available on the Motorola Q series and the Samsung Blackjack II. (Mobile Entertainment)

Attack of the Show Producer Heads to Late Night; Gavin Purcell to be co-producer on Jimmy Fallon’s talk show as the series preps its Internet debut. (Variety)

Judge: Fair Use Important Before Takedown

Score one for dancing toddlers on YouTube. Yesterday a federal judge said copyright holders must consider fair use of their works before issuing takedown notices willy-nilly to online video sharing sites. The case being considered involves Universal Music’s takedown of a video featuring Pennsylvania woman’s child dancing to Prince’s “Let’s Go Crazy.” From the Threat Level blog:

“Even if Universal is correct that fair use only excuses infringement, the fact remains that fair use is a lawful use of a copyright,” U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled. “Accordingly, in order for a copyright owner to proceed under the DMCA with ‘a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law,’ the owner must evaluate whether the material makes fair use of the copyright.”

Universal stamped its feet, protesting that if it had to actually consider fair use, it would lose precious time in responding to infringements. Fogel was not swayed basically saying while Universal had legitimate concerns, they were probably overstated.

This is the first ruling of its kind and means copyright holders must be more thoughtful before blanketing sites with takedown notices. Recently, the International Olympics Committee (IOC) sent a takedown request over a Tibetan protest video on YouTube. While the video had nothing to do with the games its title was “Beijing Olympics Opening Ceremony,” YouTube pushed back on the request and the IOC relented.

More NTV coverage on DMCA issues from this morning: Adware on Pirated Movie Sites Raises Legal Questions

Google the Next .Mac?

People are looking for a cheap, preferably free, way of getting universal access. Question is who will achieve it first, and who will get it right?

Cloud computing seems to be all the rage these days, from business collaboration tools, like Document & Spreadsheet apps, to the YouTube’s and Flickr’s of the web. Either way you look at it, it would appear that universal access is getting nearer and nearer. Eventually cloud computing will be the only computing, and the only OS you’ll need will be completely location independent. But for now, there are a few choices to get started with. Between Apple’s .Mac service and Google Apps, which is more likely for consumers to choose?

Let’s breakdown the basic features and compare the two:

Basic Features .Mac Google Apps
Mail IMAP IMAP/POP
Online Storage 10 Gigs Shared Unknown
Web Hosting check.png check.png
Backup check.png x.png
Calendar check.png check.png
Address Book check.png check.png
Syncing check.png x.png

.Mac

Since the most recent update, .Mac has brought new and exciting features. The .Mac Web Gallery offers unparalleled ability to share photos and slideshows. Users now have 10 gigs at their disposal to share between Mail and storing files. One feature that has most intrigued me is “Back To My Mac.” Currently it lets .Mac users access any of their computers from outside their own network. If I’m at home, I can access my work computer and vice versa. What interests me most is my hope of one day seeing very similar features across the iPhone and iPod Touch platforms. Imagine throwing in a bit of Front Row access, and you’re streaming your favorite videos or music from wherever you are. .Mac also offers a complete Backup and Restore utility, the ability to Sync iCal and Address Book across multiple Macs, which can come in handy especially if you’re on the go. In total these features will cost you $99 a year.

Google Apps

Currently Google offers 5.6 gigs for Gmail and has announced GDrive, their answer to online storage. Currently the amount of online storage space is unknown but I imagine it to grow similar to Gmail. Knowing Google, this probably won’t be your average online storage. Perhaps online sharing and then some? Currently box.net is my choice for online storage. They offer the capability of sharing as well as document editing. With Google you know if they introduce something new, it’s going to go above and beyond what you expect.

Google also has Picasa and Blogger under their belt. With Picasa users can currently store and share one gig worth of photos online. Page Creator lets users create websites and upload them to Blogger. Google also features Google Docs & Spreadsheets for online editing. While you may not be able to cross sync computers, or access another computer, having your Calender and Documents stored online makes remote accessibility easy. Having everything edited and stored online means you never have to worry about syncing computers to get the most up to date information. Other features include Google Talk for online communicating, Google Reader, and your own personalized homepage. Naturally the most attractive feature offered by Google is having all these utilities completely mobile and completely free.

One Google to Rule Them All?

Gmail is the true gateway drug. As soon as you switch, you feel compelled to use all the other Google utilities and features available before you. Whether your poison is Google Reader or iGoogle, there’s a strong platform to expand on. With their rate of acquisitions, Google can only stand to gain more ground. So for this user, while .Mac may look pretty and be feature friendly, but I’m sticking with Google. You can’t beat free, and you can’t be mobile the way Google achieves it.

However, I think it’s interesting to note that the CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt, is also on the Board of Directors for Apple. So while they may be competing for universal access, maybe they really are just be building off of one another.